Standard Chartered Bank Enters Into DPA For IEEPA Violations – Forfeits $227 Million

Posted On Tuesday, December 11, 2012
By:

DOJ announced yesterday that it has entered into a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with Standard Chartered Bank, a financial institution headquartered in London, to resolve potential charges relating to Standard Chartered moving more than $200 million through the U.S. financial system on behalf of sanctioned Iranian, Sudanese, Libyan and Burmese entities, in violation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).  As part of the agreement, where it agreed to forfeit $227 million to the U.S., Standard Chartered also entered into a separate DPA with the New York County DA’s Office, and separate settlement agreements with the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.  As part of the DPA with the U.S., a criminal information was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, charging Standard Chartered with one count of knowingly and willfully conspiring to violate IEEPA.

According to the government, Standard Chartered operates a branch in New York that provides wholesale banking services, primarily U.S. dollar clearing for international wire payments.  The New York branch also provides U.S. dollar correspondent banking services for Standard Chartered branches in London and Dubai.  According to court documents, from 2001 through 2007, Standard Chartered violated U.S. and New York state laws by moving millions of dollars illegally through the U.S. financial system on behalf of Iranian, Sudanese, Libyan and Burmese entities subject to U.S. economic sanctions.  The government alleged, and Standard Chartered acknowledged, that Standard Chartered knowingly and willfully engaged in this criminal conduct, which caused Standard Chartered’s branch in New York and unaffiliated U.S. financial institutions to process over $200 million in transactions that otherwise should have been rejected, blocked or stopped for investigation under the Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations relating to transactions involving sanctioned countries and parties.

The government further alleged that Standard Chartered engaged in this criminal conduct by, among other things, instructing a customer in a sanctioned country to represent itself using Standard Chartered London’s unique banking code in payment messages, replacing references to sanctioned entities in payment messages with special characters and deleting payment data that would have revealed the involvement of sanctioned entities.  This conduct occurred in various business units within Standard Chartered in locations around the world, primarily London and Dubai, with the knowledge and approval of senior corporate managers and the legal and compliance departments at Standard Chartered. It was also acknowledged that, in addition to evading U.S. economic sanctions, Standard Chartered made misleading statements to regulators to further conceal its business with sanctioned countries.

DOJ will recommend the dismissal of the information in 24 months, provided the bank fully cooperates with, and abides by, the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement.

Clean Water Act Conviction Results In 5 Year Sentence For Owner And General Manager Of Wastewater Treatment Facility

Posted On Friday, December 7, 2012
By:

After having been convicted of criminal violations of the Clean Water Act, conspiracy and obstruction of justice following a federal jury trial earlier this year, John Tuma, the former owner and general manager of Arkla Disposal Services, Inc., was sentenced on Wednesday to 60 months in prison, three years of supervised release and a $100,000 fine.  The sentence, handed down by Judge Tom Stagg in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, represents yet another example of the potential for significant consequences for environmental law violations.

Tuma was both owner and general manager of Arkla Disposal Services, Inc., a centralized wastewater treatment facility that received wastewater from industrial processes and oilfield exploration and production facilities.  According to the contract for those services, Arkla was to treat the wastewater through a multi-step treatment process before discharging it to either the city of Shreveport publicly owned treatment works or into the Red River.  Instead, Arkla discharged untreated wastewater directly into the Shreveport sewer system and the Red River.  In addition to the unlawful discharges, Tuma was convicted of obstruction of justice for obstructing an inspection by the EPA.

Several regions around the country are witnessing the rapid spread of hydrofracking operations for the recovery of natural gas located deep beneath the earth’s surface.  These operations generate significant amounts of wastewater.  As hydrofracking continues on the upswing, the proper disposal of wastewater will become increasingly difficult.  The issue is likely to remain a high priority for environmental regulators.

The potential for criminal liability for violating environmental laws in conducting hydrofracking and similar operations should not be taken lightly.  The elements of proof for regulatory violations as compared with criminal violations of most environmental statutes, including the Clean Water Act, are technically quite similar. The factors that can cause a regulatory violation to develop into a criminal case include the level of intent of the violator, the violator’s prior compliance record, whether the violator voluntarily disclosed the violation, and the amount of environmental damage caused by the violation.

Categories